alt.comp.freeware
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OT] Just how "legit" is Legit Anon?

Subject: Re: [OT] Just how "legit" is Legit Anon?
From: hummingbird
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:27:44 +0100
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware


On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:06:54 -0500  'Ron May'
wrote this on alt.comp.freeware:

>On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:03:55 -0700, "Lew *"
><Drafted1970number54SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 
>> "Me.Here" <me.here@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
>> news:g9bial$kue$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Ron May wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:31:02 -0700, Craig 
>> >> <netburgher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Each and every time /your/ priorities contravene that fact, 
>> >>> disharmony increases.  You know this.  That you continue to pretend 
>> >>> a "higher ground" leads the spidey-sense of a lot of us to sound 
>> >>> off.
>> >>
>> >> I think he/she/it knows that.  "It" has other motives that have
>> >> nothing to do with the stated ones, and since "it" has been less than
>> >> forthcoming, and is unlikely to reveal "its" true purpose and
>> >> motivation, there's little to be gained by playing "its" game.  Best
>> >> strategy is to simply ignore "it."
>> >>
>> >
>> > OMG, Ron thinks there's a conspiracy in ACF.  Better break out the 
>> > tin-foil hats   ROFL
>> 
>> Not as funny as BB's Cult fantasy.....
>
>And you don't see BB, HB or MH suggest an *IGNORE* strategy.  What
>that reveals is that they clearly recognize the tide of opinion is
>clearly not in their favor.

Clearly RM, you clearly wear your underpants waaaaaaay too tight.
Clearly.

ISTR that it's YOU who killfile those who disagree with you,
and then begin a dirty campaign of smears against them in the
certain knowledge that you won't see the replies. Cowardly or
what? jeeeeez.

-- 
   "All truth passes through three stages.
   First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed,
   and third, it is accepted as self-evident"
   (Arthur Schopenhauer)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy